Claude Code 团队如何做代码审查：从人工把关到 Claude 持续审查
Quoting Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang
Claude Code 团队认为"有没有人读过代码"是判断风险的粗略代理，真正该问的是这次改动可能出什么问题、该由哪种检查来抓。审查因此从 PR 末尾的人工关卡变成持续进行，更像写作时的拼写检查，多数改动在被人工查看前已由 Claude 至少审查并修复过一次。
16th October 2026
We think "did a human read the code?" is an imprecise proxy for "what could go wrong with this change, and which check—automated or human—is the right one to catch it?"
Asking that question also changed when review happens. Before, review was a gate at the end of the road: write the code, open a PR, wait for your colleague.
Now, review runs continuously, more like spellcheck while you write. Most changes have been reviewed and fixed by Claude at least once before a human is asked to look. This catches most routine mistakes, and saves team attention for higher-level questions and scrutiny.
— Addy Osmani, Morgan Westlee Lunt, and Qing Wang, How the Claude Code team does code review
来源：Simon Willison · simonwillison.net